Quick reference

Non-invasive tests at a glance

Formulas, cut-offs and pitfalls for the tests used in MASLD.

For
Healthcare professionals
Author
Dr. Mahmoud Al-Desoky
Version
1.0, updated 2026-10-03

Key points

  • Blood scores (FIB-4, NFS) are best at ruling out advanced fibrosis.
  • VCTE (FibroScan) and ELF are the usual second-line tests.
  • MRE is the most accurate imaging test for fibrosis but costly and less available.
  • APRI was built for hepatitis C. It is not advised for MASLD.

For the evidence, graded recommendations, a case and self-test questions, read Module 1: Assessing liver fibrosis in MASLD.

1Blood-based scores

TestInputsRule outRule inNotes
FIB-4Age, AST, ALT, platelets<1.3 (<2.0 if ≥65)≥2.67Free, first-line. Not for under 35.
NFSAge, BMI, diabetes/IFG, AST/ALT, platelets, albumin<−1.455 (<0.12 if ≥65)>0.676Similar accuracy to FIB-4. BMI and diabetes push it up.
APRIAST, platelets——Low accuracy in MASLD. Use FIB-4 instead.
ELFHA, PIIINP, TIMP-1 (lab test)<7.7≥9.8Second-line. Raised by other fibrotic conditions and age.

2Formulas

  • FIB-4 = (age × AST) ÷ (platelets × √ALT)
  • NFS = −1.675 + 0.037 × age + 0.094 × BMI + 1.13 × (IFG or diabetes: 1, else 0) + 0.99 × AST/ALT − 0.013 × platelets − 0.66 × albumin (g/dL)
  • APRI = (AST ÷ upper limit of normal) ÷ platelets × 100

3Imaging

TestMeasuresUseful cut-offsNotes
VCTE (FibroScan) LSMLiver stiffness, kPa<8 low · 8–12 grey · ≥12 high · ≥15 cACLD likelyFast 3 hours. Use the XL probe in obesity. Valid if IQR/median ≤30%.
VCTE CAPSteatosis, dB/mAbout ≥275 dB/m suggests steatosisDoes not stage fibrosis.
MR elastography (MRE)Liver stiffness, kPaCentre-specificMost accurate, costly.
MRI-PDFFLiver fat fraction≥5% = steatosisGood for tracking fat change in trials.
UltrasoundSteatosis (moderate or more)—Misses mild fat. Cannot stage fibrosis.

4Things that falsely raise liver stiffness

  • Recent meal (fast 3 hours).
  • High ALT or acute hepatitis.
  • Heart failure or liver congestion.
  • Biliary obstruction.
  • Heavy recent alcohol intake.

Related topics

References

  1. EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of MASLD. J Hepatol 2024;81:492–542. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031
  2. Rinella ME, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of NAFLD. Hepatology 2023;77:1797–835. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323
  3. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis – 2021 update. J Hepatol 2021;75:659–89. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.025
  4. Sterling RK, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology 2006;43:1317–25. doi:10.1002/hep.21178
  5. Angulo P, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007;45:846–54. doi:10.1002/hep.21496
  6. Wai CT, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003;38:518–26. doi:10.1053/jhep.2003.50346
  7. McPherson S, et al. Age as a confounding factor for the accurate non-invasive diagnosis of advanced NAFLD fibrosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:740–51. doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.453

How to cite this page

Desoky M. Non-invasive tests at a glance. Metabolic Liver Academy quick reference, version 1.0. Updated 2026-10-03. Available from: https://drmahmouddesoky.github.io/metabolic-liver-academy/ref/nit-reference.html

A summary of published guidelines for healthcare professionals. It does not replace clinical judgement, the full guidelines or local drug labels. Disclaimer.

Stay in touch

New patient guides, expert interviews and events, about once a month. No advertising; unsubscribe at any time.